While many Intel fanboys have denied that there ever was an Intel chip shortage, Chipzilla has fessed up and admitted it cocked up. Intel's Channel organisation is vowing increased communication and transparency with partners on issues such as the current CPU shortage, which has caused delays, price hikes and other challenges this year. Todd Garrigues, director of partner sales programmes at Intel (pictured), told CNN that Intel needed better transparency about supply issues, new business opportunities and new technologies are one of the company's top priorities for partners heading into 2019. "We got some feedback -- some critical feedback if I'm honest -- from some partners through our advisory boards, and we're working hard to make sure we do better at that," he said. "The request, bluntly, was to work harder at being transparent as close to real time as possible. And we took that to heart -- a lot of internal discussions on how we enable that." One of the challenges, Garrigues said, has been engaging with Intel's broader base of partners that the company may not have one-on-one relationships with. To mitigate the issue, Intel company is investing more in its relationships with distributors to boost Intel's signal. "One of the big priorities I've placed on this year is working very close with our distribution partners who do serve that broad channel base more directly," said Jason Kimrey, Intel's U.S. channel chief. "I would tell you that we have much more direct, open transparent dialogue with them to help them plan and help our mutual customers plan to roadmaps and plan around the supply."
0 Comments
While many Intel fanboys have denied that there ever was an Intel chip shortage, Chipzilla has fessed up and admitted it cocked up. Intel's Channel organisation is vowing increased communication and transparency with partners on issues such as the current CPU shortage, which has caused delays, price hikes and other challenges this year. Todd Garrigues, director of partner sales programmes at Intel (pictured), told CNN that Intel needed better transparency about supply issues, new business opportunities and new technologies are one of the company's top priorities for partners heading into 2019. "We got some feedback -- some critical feedback if I'm honest -- from some partners through our advisory boards, and we're working hard to make sure we do better at that," he said. "The request, bluntly, was to work harder at being transparent as close to real time as possible. And we took that to heart -- a lot of internal discussions on how we enable that." One of the challenges, Garrigues said, has been engaging with Intel's broader base of partners that the company may not have one-on-one relationships with. To mitigate the issue, Intel company is investing more in its relationships with distributors to boost Intel's signal. "One of the big priorities I've placed on this year is working very close with our distribution partners who do serve that broad channel base more directly," said Jason Kimrey, Intel's U.S. channel chief. "I would tell you that we have much more direct, open transparent dialogue with them to help them plan and help our mutual customers plan to roadmaps and plan around the supply." Intel (INTC - Free Report) recently unveiled Intel Connected Logistics Platform or Intel CLP, with PA Consulting and Alphabet’s (GOOGL - Free Report) Google Cloud. As the name suggests, the “connected” platform is an IoT-based (Internet of Things) solution aimed at providing users an end-to-end status of the shipment throughout the transit process. Coming to the price performance, Intel’s stock has shed 2.8% year to date, compared with the industry's decline of 14.6%. Features & Benefits The latest platform is loaded with robust capabilities, comprising edge analytics with real-time alerts of tamper or unexpected changes in location (if detected) via advanced monitoring tools. Intel CLP which utilizes Intel Atom processor provides real-time updates on the supply chain with constant environment, package and network condition alerts. The enhanced asset-tracking infuses transparency through the entire supply chain. Moreover, Intel CLP enables users to protect confidential asset information by leveraging robust data encryption capabilities of the new solution. With the new solution, the company intends to assure customers regarding the integrity, quality and security conditions of shipment in transit. The meaningful insights obtained from the reliable real-time data analytics is expected to aid companies in optimizing networks and assets, as feasible. Consequently, the customers can benefit from improved productivity, accelerated time-to-market and reduction in supply chain expenses. Logistics Companies: Primary Beneficiaries We believe Intel CLP is well poised to find application across various industries, primarily logistics companies. The new solution holds promise as logistics and transportation companies are increasingly facing huge expenses with shipping of high-value freight, involving sensitive equipment, perishable goods, among other assets. Notably, per latest CargoNet data, the U.S. and Canada witnessed 188 cargo thefts recording an average loss of approximately $143,949 per shipment in third quarter of 2018. The cargo theft on a global scale calls for a robust solution aimed at enhancing transparency of the shipment in transit. This is where Intel’s new offering comes in handy. Furthermore, per TransparencyMarketResearch report, global IoT in logistics market is envisioned to grow to approximately $63.73 billion by 2026 witnessing a CAGR of 12.4% from 2018-2026. The aforementioned factors and market reports strengthen the prospects of Intel’s latest solution, primarily in logistics and transportation domain. Growth in IOTG Revenues to Favor Top Line Intel is leaving no stone unturned to enhance freight monitoring. The company is exploring various use cases beyond logistics industry in this regard with focus on automated shipment tracking. For instance, in perishables domain, robust insights from Intel CLP is enabling Driscoll’s (a California-based company involved in providing fresh berries) to trim customer shipment rejections. In the specialty products domain, Intel assists International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. to track shipments in real-time, enabling it to address customs delays and rejections. Notably, Intel unveiled Connected Freight in collaboration with Honeywell in May 2017. These initiatives are expected to aid the company boost Internet of Things Group or IOTG revenues, consequently top-line growth. Moreover, strength in retail and video applications are anticipated to drive IOTG revenues. Notably, in third-quarter of 2018, IOTG revenues increased 8.2% from the year-ago quarter to $919 million and contributed 4.8% to total revenues. Zacks Rank & Other Key Picks Intel sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). Twitter, Inc. (TWTR - Free Report) and Upland Software (UPLD - Free Report) are some other stocks worth considering in the broader technology sector. Both the stocks flaunt a Zacks Rank of 1. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. Long-term earnings growth rate for Twitter and Upland Software are currently pegged at 22.1% and 20%, respectively. More Stock News: This Is Bigger than the iPhone! It could become the mother of all technological revolutions. Apple sold a mere 1 billion iPhones in 10 years but a new breakthrough is expected to generate more than 27 billion devices in just 3 years, creating a $1.7 trillion market. Zacks has just released a Special Report that spotlights this fast-emerging phenomenon and 6 tickers for taking advantage of it. If you don't buy now, you may kick yourself in 2020. Read More Intel's New IoT Platform to Aid Companies Trim Freight Loss - Zacks.com : http://bit.ly/2Cw7epXSeagate (NASDAQ:STX) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both considered mature tech stocks and are often owned for dividends and stability instead of growth. Seagate is the second-largest HDD (hard disk drive) maker in the world, and Intel is the world's leading manufacturer of CPUs for PCs and data centers. Unfortunately, escalating trade tensions and fears of lower enterprise spending hurt both stocks this year. Shares of Seagate tumbled nearly 40% over the past six months, while shares of Intel dropped 15%. Is either stock a worthy investment after these sell-offs? Understanding Seagate's businessSeagate generated 93% of its revenue from traditional platter-based HDDs last quarter. The remaining 7% came from its enterprise systems storage solutions, flash drives, and other products. By comparison, its chief rival, Western Digital (NASDAQ:WDC), generated half its revenue from flash-based storage products last quarter. Therefore, Seagate is less exposed to declining NAND (flash) memory prices than Western Digital, which acquired SanDisk two years ago to claim a major share of the cyclical market. On the surface, it might seem as if Seagate is being left behind as flash-based SSDs (solid-state drives) displace traditional HDDs, since SSDs are smaller, faster, more power efficient, and less prone to damage than HDDs. However, many enterprise customers still favor cheaper, higher-capacity HDDs over pricier, lower-capacity SSDs for data storage and cloud deployment purposes. So instead of exposing itself to the cyclical SSD market, Seagate focuses on selling higher-capacity HDDs to those customers and minimizes its exposure to the lower-capacity (sub-1 terabyte) HDD market, which remains vulnerable to competition from SSDs. Those strategies arguably make Seagate a more conservative and less cyclical play than Western Digital. Understanding Intel's businessLast quarter, Intel generated 53% of its revenue from its client computing group, which mainly houses its PC CPUs. Thirty-two percent of revenue came from its data center group, which produces the chips that power over 95% of data centers worldwide. The rest of Intel's revenue derives from three other businesses -- the IoT (internet of things) group, which produces low-power chips and software for connected devices; the non-volatile memory solutions group, which produces specialized memory chips; and the programmable solutions group, which produces programmable chips (FPGAs) for a wide variety of industries. Intel faced three main headwinds in recent quarters. First, it's been struggling with a chip shortage caused by production constraints for 10-nanometer chips and higher demand for its 14-nanometer data center chips. Second, Advanced Micro Devices' (NASDAQ:AMD) newer Ryzen CPUs for PCs and Epyc CPUs for data centers are denting Intel's share of both markets. Last, tariffs could throttle its growth in China. Which company is growing faster?Seagate posted double-digit sales growth over the past two quarters, as it consistently grew its average capacity per HDD and its average selling price per drive. Last quarter, its total exabytes shipped surged 41% year-over-year to 98.9, its average capacity per drive rose 32% to 2.5 terabytes, and its average selling price rose 9% to $70. Those improvements boosted Seagate's total revenue by 14% year over year to $3.0 billion as its gross margin expanded from 28% to 31%. Its non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS), lifted by buybacks, surged 77% to $1.70. But looking ahead, analysts expect Seagate's revenue and earnings to decline 5% and 6%, respectively, this fiscal year (which ends on June 29) -- due to softer demand for nearline HDDs, lower seasonal demand for gaming consoles, tougher year-over-year comparisons to the cyclically high demand for cloud storage solutions in fiscal 2018, falling prices of SSDs, and uncertainties in the Chinese enterprise market. Intel also reported double-digit sales growth over the past two quarters, as demand for its core PC and data center chips continue to rise amid the aforementioned headwinds. Last quarter, Intel's client computing revenue grew 16% year over year and its data center revenue surged 26%, boosting its total revenue by 19% to $19.2 billion. Intel's non-GAAP gross margin expanded from 64% to 64.9%, as its EPS -- also buoyed by buybacks -- rose 39% to $1.40 on the same basis. Wall Street expects Intel's revenue and earnings to rise 14% and 31%, respectively, this year but to dip to just 3% sales growth and 1% earnings growth next year. The company's main challenges include peaking PC sales, tougher competition from AMD, impacts from tariffs, slower demand for semiconductors worldwide, and tougher year-over-year comparisons. The valuations, dividends, and buybacksSeagate trades at just seven times forward earnings, which is lower than Intel's forward P/E of 10. Seagate's forward dividend yield of 6.5% is also much higher than Intel's 2.5% yield. Those low valuations and high yields should set a floor under both stocks, and both companies are repurchasing plenty of shares. However, many investors consider this year a cyclical peak for both companies, so both could face a rough 2019 as enterprise spending slows down. But if I had to pick one over the other, I'd stick with Intel, which has a better-diversified portfolio with more irons in the fire across multiple markets. Read More Better Buy: Seagate Technology vs. Intel Corporation - Motley Fool : http://bit.ly/2ShHyD2We’re less than a couple weeks post Intel Architecture Day 2018 but still some ways away from the official reveal of what Intel’s Dedicate GPU will look like. But that didn’t stop the very talented Cristiano Siqueira from taking his idea of what the card could look like and creating it in Solidworks and rendering it out in KeyShot on his i9 7980XE no less. It should go without saying but I suppose it’s important to make the very clear distinction that this in not Intel’s design but rather 100% Cristiano’s. His concept clearly takes it’s ques from the recent Intel Optane SSD 905P Series and boy does it translate to a full size graphics card in quite the stunning way. It would be very welcome to see something similar to this in the final product that Intel shows off as it offers a very distinct look when compared to their competitors, and perhaps that blue lighting could be RG and B? The PCI-e power connectors on the rear of the card make for an interesting placement as it more closely mimics data center GPUs over a traditional consumer layout with the power connectors on the side. While we have reported on leaked renders of video cards in the past I’m not sure we’ve reported on fan made creations like this. While this isn’t intended to be a news item, it is interesting to look at a very well done fan creation of what someone envisions when they think of what Intel could possibly do with their Xe card design, assuming Xe is even going to be on the branding as road maps and names do have a tendency to change as time marches forward.
We’d love to hear your thoughts on this well done render and what you hope to see Intel show off in the final finished product that is still slated for 2020. Share Tweet Submit Read More Fan Made Concept For Upcoming Intel Xe Dedicated GPU Is Insane - Wccftech : http://bit.ly/2EOAxXpRecap: In early December we reported of an internal Gigabyte presentation that claimed Intel would be launching “F” variants of their current 9th-gen lineup. Over the last few days, at least eight different online retailers have begun listing the Core i9-9900KF, i7-9700KF, i5-9600KF and i5-9400F with their prices and their release date: January 3rd.The “F” at the end of the name would mean no integrated graphics. While this could be a method of shrinking the die size, it’s more likely a way for Intel to sell processors with normal cores but defective iGPUs. A disabled iGPU does have the advantage of acting as ‘dark silicon,’ a part of the processor that helps spread heat and thus improve thermal performance. If this is the case, then the processors will probably arrive with higher boost clock speeds at similar prices to their current counterparts. The Core i5-9400F would be a six-core six-thread part, with a base clock of 2.9Ghz and a boost clock of 4.1Ghz, both 100Mhz faster than the 8400. However, the supposed price comes in generally cheaper than the 8400's $219 at $188 on the Finish website Yritysten, $191 on American site Provantage and $200 on Canadian website Direct Dial. Central Point, a website providing service in the Netherlands lists the price at $226, and Norwegian retailer Upheads places it at $255. It’s not unusual to see variation across regions. Other than the 3.7Ghz base clock, the specs of the Core i5-9600KF are unlisted. With the exception of Yritysten that prices it at $188, the prices are way above the $279 the 9600K can be found for at the moment. European website Networkx is the second cheapest, at $313, and then comes Central Point at $324. Once again Uphead is the most expensive, at $355. The original Gigabyte leak listed two additional processors, the i3-9350KF and the i3-8100F. The i7-9700KF is in a worse position. Once again the 3.7Ghz base clock is the only known spec, but while both the Norwegian Teneodata and Upheads list the processor, only Upheads has the price, at an exorbitant $528. Given that Upheads has listed the prices of the other processors above other retailers, however there remains hope that the 9700KF will find itself a little closer to the 9700K’s $399. Saving the best for last, the Core i9-9900KF has been listed on three websites, all of which agree on a 3.6Ghz base clock. Central point lists it for $590 while Upheads lists it for $673. Once again, we suspect it will arrive closer to the $549 the 9900K fetches when it lands in the US. In the case of the 9400KF and 9600KF, if they do release with similar specs to their current counterparts, they’d be quite a steal at some of these websites. If the January 3rd release date is to be believed, then they'll likely debut at CES early next month. Keep your eyes open for Intel’s announcement and our potential upcoming review. Related ReadsAs I approached one month with the Google Pixel Slate, I placed an order for my own Intel Core m3 model while my Pixelbook sold on Swappa. There have been a lot of questions about the performance difference in these two models and after a few days I have yet to find any noticeable differences and am pleased that I was able to save $200 and get the Brydge G-Type keyboard with a total cost of the combo less than the Core i5 Pixel Slate. While I wanted a way to try to answer reader and listener questions about the Core m3 vs i5 models, it was Marques Brownlee that motivated me to create a video showing the performance of each of these models of the Pixel Slate. MKBHD posted a Google Pixel Slate review, but it wasn't until minute 6 out of 9:32 that we learned he had purchased the cheapest Pixel Slate with just 4GB of RAM and an Intel Celeron processor for $599. I would love to have seen the title of his review make it crystal clear he tested the cheapest Pixel Slate as the current title leads one to believe that all models of the Pixel Slate are garbage and that is not what I, and others, have experienced. Marques was impressed with the hardware of the Pixel Slate and said it had the potential to be a great laptop, but he showed a lot of lag in the device. Given that the Chromebook Pixels of the past and last year's Pixelbook were high end machines for die-hard Google Chrome OS fans, it may have been a mistake for Google to release a low end device without some major caveats. Also: Pixel Slate review: Google tablet vs iPad or Surface? It's beyond compare The Intel Celeron model is available with 4GB and 8GB RAM options so it is possible paying $100 more for twice the RAM might have helped with some of the lag issues seen by Marques. My MoTR podcast co-host, Kevin Tofel, is a Chromebooks expert who teaches me about these devices. He also wrote up an article on the Celeron model and points out that comparing a $599 Pixel Slate to a $999 Apple iPad isn't an apples-to-apples comparison. While the Pixel Slate is being sold as a tablet, it is a Chromebook first with a focus on the full desktop version of the Google Chrome browser while Apple has spent years refining the Apple iPad as a tablet first device that has limited functionality as a desktop alternative. In my video I tried to perform some of the same things as Marques with multiple apps and Chrome tabs running, scrolling on text and video heavy web pages, rotating between portrait and landscape, and more. I actually had 12 tabs/apps open while Marques only showed 8 so I was pushing it a bit more with the m3 and i5 models. As you can see in my video, there isn't any real difference in performance between the m3 and i5 models while both perform as fast as one would like and expect. I'm not trying to convince anyone to buy a Pixel Slate over an iPad or Surface Pro device since we each have our own needs and desires. However, for me, the Pixel Slate is nearly perfect and has performed like a champ since the day I started testing out the evaluation unit. I have no regrets with my Core m3 model and look forward to more extensive testing over the coming weeks and months. Also: G-Type Keyboard for Pixel Slate hands-on: Brydge's solution perfects Google's tablet Read More Google Pixel Slate Intel Core m3 vs i5: Use the $200 savings to buy a keyboard - ZDNet : https://zd.net/2QNN6s3It's been eight years since chip giant Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) established its contract chip manufacturing division, known as Intel Custom Foundry (ICF). In that time, this business has failed to gain meaningful traction -- something that's evident in the fact that Intel doesn't even bother to report revenue and profit results for that segment. Sure, the company has made a lot of noise about a few relatively small deals. It even managed to get programmable logic maker Altera to sign on as a customer (although Intel bought Altera before those first products ever shipped). But in general, ICF hasn't delivered value to shareholders. That's why it didn't surprise me when Daniel Nenni with semiconductor-focused website SemiWiki reported on Dec. 17 that Intel had pulled the plug on ICF. (The author said that this was "verified through multiple sources.") Of course, Intel declined to comment, but I think the odds that this report is accurate are extremely good. Here's why. Would you trust Intel to build your chips?Back in 2014, Sunit Rikhi, who at the time led ICF, presented a slide that said ICF's value proposition was "[leadership] silicon technologies." In that slide deck, Intel boasted that it had a roughly "3.5 year lead in introducing revolutionary transistor technologies," along with some other claims that I'll let you see for yourself in the slide below: Unfortunately for Intel and ICF, the company stumbled with the introduction of its 14nm technology, and its 10nm technology is so delayed that it still isn't in mass production today. The company has told investors to expect the first systems based on chips manufactured using that technology to be on shelves for the "holiday selling season" in 2019. Intel's main competitor in leading-edge chip manufacturing technologies -- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (NYSE:TSM), or TSMC -- has already managed to put its 10nm technology (which, by Intel's admission, provides better chip density than its own 14nm technology) as well as the follow-on to that, known as 7nm, into mass production. Ask yourself this: If you were the head of a company that needed to pick a manufacturing partner for your latest chip design, would you pick the company that doesn't have a solid track record of building other companies' chips for them, and has struggled mightily to get its latest chip manufacturing technology into mass production? Or would you choose the company that generates tens of billions of dollars each year from building other companies' designs and, for good measure, has been executing well in bringing new manufacturing technologies to market in recent years? If it were my business on the line, I know which one I'd pick -- and it wouldn't be Intel. It's no longer neededAnother thing to keep in mind is that, according to Intel, the total addressable market (TAM) that it's going after with its own internally-designed products is quite significant. Indeed, in a recent editorial, Intel said it is now "competing to win in an estimated $300 billion total addressable market for silicon -- making a more diverse array of products at ever-higher volumes for a broader set of customers." I've written about some of my issues with that TAM number in the past. For example, Intel counts the entirety of the mobile applications market as part of this figure, even though it can only address a relatively small portion of that figure with its current product offerings. However, the point is that Intel probably thinks there's enough room for it to grow by selling its own products that trying to build other companies' products just isn't as attractive as it might have been in 2012 or 2013 -- years during which the chip giant suffered modest revenue declines. Investor takeawayIf it's true that Intel has pulled the plug on ICF, then that's probably the right move for the chip giant. Intel seems better off focusing its considerable resources on building its own products intended to go after what it says is a $300 billion total addressable market: a significant multiple of the $71.2 billion in sales that the company expects to rake in during 2018. Ashraf Eassa has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Intel’s high-end desktop processors may soon ship without integrated graphics built in, which may be beneficial to users, like gamers, who need more performance from their PC setup. Recently, we’ve heard rumors that Intel may launch some ninth-generation desktop processors without Intel UHD Graphics 630, and now hardware retailers in Norway and Finland have outed four new Coffee Lake refresh processors ahead of Intel’s announcement along with their prices. The Intel processors listed by Scandinavian retail partners all contain an “F” in the product designation, suggesting that it will ship with integrated graphics disabled. The processors include the Intel Core i9-9900KF, Core i7-9700KF, Core i5-9600KF, and Core i5-9400F. The move suggests that Intel may be targeting high-end users who will build or configure their systems with their own choice of discrete graphics cards. Casual users, on the other hand, may buy pre-built or pre-configured system and won’t even have to worry about what graphics option is included out of the box. For performance users who want to squeeze extra processing power out of their CPUs, Intel’s move could allow for faster clock speeds. By turning off the integrated graphics, the chips would generate less heat, in theory, allowing for faster boost speeds or even better overclocking capabilities. “The disabled unit would also serve as ‘dark silicon,’ which is unused silicon that absorbs heat from surrounding chip structures, thus improving thermal performance,” Tom’s Hardware cited as an advantage of Intel’s reported move. This strategy could also help Intel improve production yields as it continues to struggle with capacity. During the fabrication process, if a chip is found with a defect that occurs in the integrated graphics core, Intel could, in theory, turn off the graphics portion and sell it as a high-end processor part without integrated graphics enabled. This would allow Intel to boost yields and not have to discard faulty processors. The company already does something similar on the processor side — if a defect is found on a processing core, Intel disables that core and sells it as a lower-end CPU with less number of cores. The retailers state that the chips will be in stock by January 3, suggesting that Intel may be making an announcement soon. With CES slated for early January, the venue could be a likely place where these processors debut. The retailers list the Intel Core i5-9400F at $255.15, while the Core i5-9600KF is suggested to come with a price range of between $188 and $355. The high-end Core i9-9900KF could go as high as $684. These prices likely include conversion rates, as Intel’s current Core i9-9900K processor with integrated graphics is listed for only $549 in the U.S. For its part, Intel is working on its own discrete graphics options to compete against Nvidia and AMD. The Intel discrete graphics cards could arrive by 2020. Editors' RecommendationsApple Inc. will likely ship Mac computers with its own ARM-based chips from 2020. This could result in $3 billion loss of revenue and a 5% decline in earnings for Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), according to our estimates. We have created an interactive dashboard ~ How Much Revenue And EPS Could Intel Stand To Lose If Apple Deploys Its Own Chips For Mac ~ that shows our estimates and assumptions. You can modify our assumptions to see the impact Apple’s own chips would have on Intel’s earnings. Apple Inc. could launch the first Macs powered by its own ARM processors as early as 2020-2021. The Macs currently use Intel chips, and it will have a limited impact on Intel’s top and bottom line. Apple sold 18.2 million Macs in 2018. Assuming an average price point of $180 for each processor chip, Intel will likely lose $3.3 billion or roughly 5% of its revenues. To understand the impact on earnings, we use an adjusted net income margin of a little under 30%, assuming Intel’s overall adjusted net income margins are similar to the margins for Mac chips, and the share count of roughly 4.6 billion. We thus arrive at $0.21 figure for Mac’s contribution to Intel’s earnings per share, which is a roughly 5% potential loss of earnings for Intel. This 5% figure suggests that the risk exposure is not particularly high for Intel. In addition, this figure could further shrink over time because of stagnation in the PC market, and the growth expected in other segments in which Intel operates. In fact for Intel, the real problem currently is the market share loss to AMD, especially in the data center market. AMD has been on a strong run in the recent quarters, gaining market share, given the high demand for its Ryzen and EPYC products. Accordingly, Intel should worry more about how to maintain its dominance in the data center market. What’s behind Trefis? See How it’s Powering New Collaboration and What-Ifs For CFOs and Finance Teams | Product, R&D, and Marketing Teams Like our charts? Explore example interactive dashboards and create your own. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2020
Categories |